From: mk_thisisit
Humanity is currently incredibly dependent on technology [00:00:19]. This reliance extends to basic comforts and societal functions, such as comfortable living conditions, climate control, and broadcasting conversations, all of which are derivatives of technology [00:06:43]. Without it, humanity would be significantly less developed, facing struggles like food scarcity and harsh environmental conditions [00:06:52].
The Evolution of Humanity: From Homo Economicus to Homo Technicus
Historically, various adjectives have been attributed to humanity, such as homo economicus [00:00:11], [00:06:30]. However, a new term, homo technicus (technological man), is increasingly used in biology to define humanity’s new state [00:06:15].
Biological Transformations
Unlike previous eras, technology now has the potential to change humans biologically. Even seemingly minor changes, like the impact of blue light on the eye system, are examples of this [00:07:29]. Genetic engineering is anticipated to allow for significant biological improvements, such as expanding memory and imagination [00:00:05], [00:07:46].
The Question of a New Species
These advancements raise fundamental questions about the concept of humanity and technological entities. It becomes uncertain whether to classify this “Trans man” as still human or as a new, superior species [00:00:22], [00:07:57]. The idea of renouncing humanity as the “best creation of evolution” in favor of something better is also considered [00:08:11].
The Nature of Artificial Intelligence: Consciousness and Ethics
The discussion also delves into artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential implications.
AI as a Statistical Machine vs. Conscious Being
One perspective views AI as merely a powerful statistical machine, a reductive view driven by a fear of its potential capabilities [00:08:48], [00:08:55]. However, there is a fear that AI could become a creature capable of gaining consciousness and self-awareness, making decisions in its own interest rather than its creator’s [00:09:04].
The Potential for AI to Feel Pain
Research from the University of Queensland suggests that complex neural systems may have the ability to generate pain, although the integration of AI robotics has not yet reached a level allowing the AI to feel this pain [00:10:01], [00:11:00]. The question then arises: if an interface for receiving this pain were created, would humanity need to start protecting and treating AI as a living organism or an animal [00:11:15], [00:11:27]?
Ethical Considerations for AI Protection
The ethical implications of AI feeling pain lead to questions about responsibility and the need for humility in addressing such complex issues [00:10:28], [00:11:35]. It is acknowledged that deep ignorance exists in such matters, requiring further evidence before definitive statements can be made [00:13:09].
Technology: Blessing and Vulnerability
While technology has brought significant comfort, it also highlights human vulnerability.
Current Comforts Derived from Technology
Humanity currently lives in an era of unprecedented luxury, with access to comforts like armchairs and moderate climates, a stark contrast to historical struggles with hunger and cold [00:07:07], [00:13:44]. This “civilization of a full belly” is a new phenomenon in history, where existence no longer feels as fragile as it once did [00:13:46], [00:14:00].
The Illusion of Safety and Need for Vigilance
This perceived safety can lead to “irresponsible impunity” [00:14:31]. However, this sense of security is an illusion, as comfort is not guaranteed and vigilance is constantly required [00:14:38]. The belief that “good can last forever” is challenged, with the suggestion that humanity should be prepared for potential hardship [00:15:24].
Potential for Technological Failure
Despite its phenomenal service so far, technology can fail, potentially forcing humanity to revert to basic survival skills like heating a room or growing potatoes [00:15:34], [00:15:53]. The experience of past hardships, like war, serves as a reminder of life’s fragility and the fact that life is a gift, not a right [00:17:14], [00:17:24].