From: jcs

Initial Response and Investigation

In mid-2018, law enforcement was alerted to a welfare check when Cody Amato failed to show up for work and did not respond to phone calls [00:02:01]. Police arrived at the Amato residence at 9:17 AM and gained access to the home via the back entrance using a knife after receiving no answer at the front door [00:02:11]. Inside, Chad, Margaret, and Cody Amato were found dead from gunshot wounds to the head from a nine-millimeter handgun [00:02:22].

Grant Amato, the youngest son, immediately became the prime suspect. This was based on a witness statement from Cody’s girlfriend, who informed police about a heated confrontation between Grant and his father the night before, alongside other “bizarre circumstances” leading up to the discovery [00:02:26]. Investigative techniques led to Grant being traced to a hotel in Orlando [00:02:38].

Interrogation Strategies

Upon locating Grant, detectives secured his cooperation; he immediately agreed to accompany them to the police station for an interview [00:03:01]. Reports indicate Grant was not informed of his family’s deaths, nor the purpose of the interview, and he did not inquire himself [00:03:07], [00:03:57]. This established the conditions for the interrogation.

Detectives employed several interrogation strategies and tactics during the interview:

Building Rapport

The lead investigator’s initial plan was to establish a friendly connection with Grant, a common tactical procedure aimed at eliciting a more detailed discourse [00:04:23]. Detectives offered comfort, asking if he needed to use the bathroom, or wanted a drink or snacks [00:04:10]. Despite these attempts, the overall interrogation was described as “fascinatingly aggravating” [00:04:38].

Confrontation and Justification

The first direct confrontation occurred when the detective asked Grant why he thought they were having this conversation [00:07:07]. Grant claimed not to know but admitted to being “freaked out” given the situation when he left home [00:24:10].

The lead detective used the following approaches:

  • Emphasizing honesty: Stating that “the truth always is the best thing to do” [00:25:21].
  • Normalizing the act: Suggesting “accidents happen” and “things in the heat of the moment things happen that we wish hadn’t happened” [00:25:35]. He offered personal anecdotes about snapping at his own children [00:24:44].
  • Claiming to know the truth: Stating he could “read people” and that Grant’s eyes and body language indicated he wanted to “get something off his chest” [00:25:01]. He explicitly said, “we knew everything before we asked you the questions” [00:26:31].
  • Offering help: Stating the police were there to “help you with issues you may have” and that being honest would “make you feel better in the end” [00:26:50]. He asserted he would “deal with someone and help them till the end no matter what” [00:28:27].
  • Providing scenarios: The female detective specifically offered justifications for the crime, making admission less intimidating by suggesting Grant might have been “defending yourself” or acting “in fear” [00:31:27]. This strategy aimed to present a “lesser infraction” option [00:39:30].
  • Highlighting dire consequences: The detective warned that if Grant didn’t confess, he “can’t get any help from anybody” [00:40:40], comparing the situation to a bomb that cannot be diffused once it has exploded [00:31:45].
  • Drawing out silence: When Grant’s composure began to slip, detectives strategically used silence to increase pressure [00:38:17].

Suspect’s Denial and Shifting Blame

Grant repeatedly denied involvement, stating, “I didn’t do any of this” [00:40:03]. He attempted to frame his brother, Cody, for the murders, suggesting Cody “would take care of it” after being updated by their mother [00:21:02]. He suggested a shooting occurred “between Cody and my dad” to protect him or help him [00:36:13].

However, forensic evidence later contradicted Grant’s account:

  • Margaret Amato was shot in the back of the head while at the computer [00:21:34].
  • Chad Amato was shot twice in the head upon entering the kitchen [00:21:41].
  • Cody Amato received a text from his father’s phone asking him to come home urgently, and was found with a gunshot wound to the face in the fetal position, likely after pleading for his life [00:21:45].
  • Grant used Cody’s stolen credit card to spend $600 on a cam site approximately 30 minutes after the murders [00:21:58], [00:52:11]. He used free Wi-Fi at a Publix supermarket parking lot for this transaction [00:22:30].

Conclusion of Interrogation and Trial

Despite the detectives’ attempts to elicit a confession, Grant maintained his innocence. He was arrested nine hours later at his hotel [00:51:30]. His trial began on August 12, 2019 [00:51:32]. The prosecution argued the case was about Grant’s “blind obsession” with a cam model and his “absolute contempt” for his family, who he blamed for his perceived “end of the world” [00:52:30]. Grant Amato was sentenced to life in prison without parole [00:52:55].