Tubegraph

Inference and training considerations for modern GPUs

7 min read

From: hu-po

Modern GPUs are central to both the training and finetuning processes for AI models and inference of large language models (LLMs). The choice and configuration of hardware, alongside software optimizations, significantly impact performance and accessibility.

Training Hardware

Training large language models requires significant computational power. High-end GPUs are essential for this task. For instance, models are fine-tuned using configurations like eight Nvidia H100s, which represents the pinnacle of current training hardware capabilities, soon to be eclipsed by H200s [00:30:21]. These GPUs are designed to support higher precision data types for robust training [01:23:29].

Inference Hardware

While training demands powerful, specialized hardware, inference often targets consumer-grade devices or specialized inference chips for broader accessibility.

  • Consumer GPUs: An Nvidia RTX 4090 with 24 GB of VRAM, paired with an Intel CPU and 64 GB of CPU RAM, is considered a good consumer-grade setup for deep learning inference [00:31:14].
  • Apple Hardware: Apple’s models are explicitly designed for deployment on their devices, such as the Apple MacBook Pro with an M2 Max system on chip and 64 GB of RAM [00:32:53]. Apple utilizes its MLX library for inference and fine-tuning on its devices [00:18:16].
  • Specialized Inference Chips: The future of GPU hardware might see a divergence, with specialized inference GPUs (like those from Groq) designed for extremely small data types to maximize speed [01:23:47].

Memory Considerations

Different levels of memory exist within a computing system, impacting the speed and efficiency of operations:

  • CPU Memory (DRAM): This is the lowest level of memory, typically in large quantities (e.g., 64 GB of DDR5 DRAM) [01:31:31]. Data must be moved from CPU memory to GPU memory for processing, which can be a bottleneck [01:31:00].
  • GPU Memory (VRAM, SRAM, HBM): GPUs have their own dedicated memory. Flash Attention, for example, is a technique that optimizes performance by strategically storing data on different levels of GPU memory [01:14:14]. The speed of communication (bandwidth) between different memory components is as crucial as the total amount of RAM [01:31:10].

Performance Optimizations

To enhance both inference challenges and optimizations in visionbased agents and energy and compute optimization in AI models, several technical aspects of AI model training and finetuning are employed:

Model Architectures

Most modern language models, including OpenELM and Phi-3, utilize a decoder-only Transformer architecture [00:09:12]. This architecture is designed for auto-regressive token generation, simplifying the original encoder-decoder Transformer used for tasks like translation by making the input sequence part of the self-attention process [00:10:42].

Attention Mechanisms

  • Grouped Query Attention (GQA): This method optimizes multi-head attention by having multiple queries share a single key and value pair. This reduces the size of the KV cache, leading to more efficient inference [01:13:08].
  • Flash Attention: A technique that speeds up the attention mechanism (the slowest part of a Transformer) by exploiting how memory is stored on the GPU. It intelligently manages data movement between different levels of GPU memory [01:13:57]. This is a form of memory optimization in neural networks by taking advantage of memory hierarchy.

Normalization

  • Pre-normalization: Normalization layers are placed before attention and feed-forward layers in modern Transformers, rather than after them [01:12:39].
  • RMS Norm vs. Layer Norm: Root Mean Square (RMS) Norm is often used for normalization. However, if not implemented efficiently, it can be slower than Layer Norm, especially if Layer Norm benefits from “fused kernels” [01:33:45].

Fused Kernels

A kernel is the actual operation that runs on a GPU. Fusing kernels means combining multiple sequential operations (like matrix multiplication, dropout, activation) into a single, optimized operation that runs concurrently. This significantly reduces execution time by minimizing memory transfers between distinct operations [01:37:35]. The development of fused kernels is complex and often requires manual optimization [01:39:47].

Quantization and Data Types

Energy and Compute Optimization in AI Models is heavily reliant on quantization. Quantization reduces the precision of model parameters (weights), storing them in fewer bits (e.g., from 16-bit floating point to 4-bit integer). This reduces memory footprint and speeds up computation, enabling models to run on resource-limited devices like smartphones [00:48:00].

  • Data Types: Numbers in computers are represented by a specific number of bits. Common data types for AI models include:
    • BF16 (Brain Float 16): A 16-bit floating point format with more exponent bits, allowing for a wider range of numbers [00:49:13].
    • FP16 (Floating Point 16): A standard 16-bit floating point format.
    • Int8/Int4: Integer types using 8 or 4 bits, respectively. These are significantly smaller than floating-point types [00:49:32].
    • 1-bit LLMs: An extreme form of quantization where model weights are stored in approximately one bit per parameter, though typically some parameters remain at higher precision [00:50:46].
  • Post-training Quantization (PTQ): Quantizing a model after it has been fully trained [01:11:10].
  • Quantization Techniques: Various algorithms exist (e.g., GPTQ, AWQ, SmoothQuant, BiLLM) that employ different tricks to minimize performance degradation when quantizing [01:51:24]. Quantizing to 4 or 8 bits often yields comparable performance to 16-bit models while significantly reducing size and improving speed [01:52:50].

Fine-tuning

Pretraining and finetuning in AI models is a crucial step.

  • Instruction Tuning: After pre-training, models undergo instruction tuning using curated datasets (e.g., math, coding, safety) and techniques like Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to align their behavior with user instructions and safety guidelines [01:04:09].
  • Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA): A technical aspect of AI model training and finetuning that enables efficient fine-tuning. Instead of updating all original model weights, LoRA introduces small, low-rank matrices (adapters) that are trained. This significantly reduces the number of trainable parameters and GPU memory requirements during fine-tuning, making it much more accessible [01:14:57]. LoRA can be combined with quantization (e.g., QLoRA, LoRA-FT) to recover some performance lost due to quantization [01:15:17].

Impact of Model Evolution on Hardware

Recent models like Llama 3, despite their powerful performance, exhibit a “fragility” to aggressive quantization that was not as pronounced in earlier models like Llama 1 and Llama 2 [01:18:07].

  • Previously, heavily quantized Llama 1 and 2 models, when fine-tuned with LoRA, could surpass their original 16-bit counterparts [01:18:07].
  • However, with Llama 3 (trained on an unprecedented 15 trillion tokens), even LoRA fine-tuning cannot fully compensate for the performance degradation caused by low-bit quantization [01:18:17]. A quantized Llama 3 still outperforms a quantized Llama 2, but it cannot beat the original 16-bit Llama 3 [01:18:43]. This suggests that models trained on massive datasets with less “capacity” might be more sensitive to reduced precision [01:21:10].

The observed “fragility” of newer, highly-trained models to quantization creates uncertainty for future trends in machine learning software and hardware:

  • If future models continue to be sensitive to quantization, inference might increasingly be performed at higher precisions (e.g., 16-bit), diminishing the advantage of specialized low-bit inference hardware [01:24:49].
  • This could lead to a unified GPU architecture for both training and inference, where Nvidia, with its focus on high-precision training GPUs, would maintain market dominance [01:25:01].
  • Conversely, if developments in deep learning hardware enable better quantization, a bifurcation of the GPU market might occur:
    • Training GPU companies: Like Nvidia, focusing on high-precision, high-capacity GPUs.
    • Inference GPU companies: Like Groq, specializing in highly efficient, low-precision hardware tailored for quantized models [01:25:54].

The increasing open-sourcing of models by major tech companies (Meta, Apple) means that fewer entities might need to perform large-scale training themselves, shifting demand towards inference hardware [01:26:18].

Accessibility and Cost

Training large-scale LLMs requires millions of dollars, making it inaccessible to individual programmers [01:22:01]. Even renting high-end GPUs from cloud providers can be expensive, though often more cost-effective than purchasing dedicated hardware for individual projects [01:32:07]. The best approach for individuals is often to fine-tune existing models on their specific use cases [01:22:15].

Graph View

Backlinks